Let’s set aside politics, hypothetically speaking, and examine the impact of recent events on individuals.
A week prior, President Trump declared the termination of SNAP benefits for 42 million Americans, amidst a government shutdown reaching its 40th day.
This unfolds as millions of federal employees remain unpaid during the ongoing shutdown, many relying on each paycheck.
Simultaneously, Trump hosted a lavish, Great Gatsby-themed party at Mar-a-Lago, featuring opera and delicacies like blue cheese mousse, sliced beef filet, seared scallops, and Trump chocolate cake.
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ALLUDES TO EXTENSIVE SNAP MISUSE AS FUNDING IS INTERRUPTED DURING SHUTDOWN
A federal judge mandated the resumption of SNAP benefits, costing $8.5 billion monthly, but the Supreme Court granted Trump time for appeal.
After at least nine states offered to cover SNAP benefits during the crisis, Trump demanded they “immediately reverse” efforts to provide food stamps to lower-income families, or face financial penalties.
Consider this: how is the president perceived in light of these events?
Though I dislike the term, what are the public impressions of this resolute effort to prevent hungry families from receiving these benefits?
After all, when Timothy Mellon, a wealthy banking and railroad magnate, offered $130 million to ensure troop payments during the shutdown, Trump accepted the offer.
After all, the Trump tax cut disproportionately favored the wealthy.
After all, Trump further reduced capital gains taxes on home sales, primarily benefiting the affluent, potentially enabling them to pay zero or a reduced rate. This likely doesn’t apply if you’re unaware.
TRUMP ADMIN WARNS 42 MILLION AMERICANS COULD LOSE FOOD STAMPS AS SHUTDOWN CONTINUES
After all — perhaps most oddly — Trump suggested Obamacare is so flawed that he wants to issue $2,000 checks for individuals to purchase their own insurance.
But where would they purchase it, if not from an insurance provider? And what would happen during a stock market crash? The privatization of health insurance has historically failed for good reason.
Returning to politics (unavoidably), how does any of this benefit Trump?
I understand the idea that he may be intensifying the discomfort to pressure Democrats to end the shutdown on his terms.
The Democrats, who have emphasized rising Obamacare premiums and express concerns about millions losing coverage without extended subsidies, have resisted longer than anticipated.
Arguably, both sides share considerable blame for the continued stalemate and failure to compromise, which is their responsibility.
But do Trump and JD Vance, who deemed the judge’s order “absurd,” appear indifferent to millions of families facing hunger, or resorting to discarded food?
Is there a credible alternative explanation?
DOJ ACCUSES FEDERAL JUDGE OF ‘MOCKING THE SEPARATION OF POWERS’ IN SNAP APPEAL
Blaming the opposition is typical political behavior. However, is it appropriate during a self-inflicted crisis?
With accusations of cruelty being made, is there a higher strategic motive that benefits Trump?
Trump alleges former President Joe Biden “went completely mad” and indiscriminately provided food stamps. Is this an example of unchecked liberalism? I investigated further.
Eligibility is subject to income limits and work requirements. Furthermore, the common assertion that illegal immigrants receive SNAP benefits is incorrect, although exemptions exist for children and refugees. (Instances of fraud cannot be entirely excluded.)
During the pandemic, as unemployment surged, Congress temporarily suspended work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents. This occurred under … President Trump, during his initial term in 2020.
In 2023, an agreement with Republicans increased SNAP work requirements. That happened under … Biden. Some Republicans, however, felt the changes were insufficient.
Incidentally, SNAP participation peaked in the fall of 2017, under Trump, in response to hurricane emergencies.
I apologize for the detailed analysis, but I considered it worthwhile.
Most lack the time or inclination to delve into such details. They simply know that they and millions of other low-income families are not receiving expected food aid. Many hold Trump responsible, especially given his persistent efforts to prevent states from providing assistance.
